从依赖推理到建构事实——对案件事实认定模式的逻辑学、文化学分析  

From Inference Dependence to Fact Construction: A Logical and Cultural Analysis of Fact Identification Models for Cases

作　　者：张存建[1] 

机构地区：[1]江苏师范大学法政学院,江苏徐州221116

出　　处：《贵州民族大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2015年第1期130-136,共7页Journal of Guizhou Minzu University:Philosophy and Social Science

基　　金：江苏省社会科学基金项目"逻辑视域的案件事实认定模式研究"[编号:13ZXD017]

摘　　要：案件事实理论研究一般将案件事实视为推理的结果,并集中于解释作为个体的法官或者陪审员如何认定案件事实。然而,自媒体信息传播凸显了个体推理的可接受性问题,要求我们反思案件事实认定模式之所以依赖推理的原因,关注逻辑学的规范性文化功能。构建符合我国实际的案件事实认定模式,需要接受一个文化变迁的视角,既应当破除对程序完美的依恋,也应当重视求同思维习惯的识别与超越问题,将案件事实解释为事实建构的结果。The theoretical research on case facts generally regards case facts as results of inference and concentrates on how an individual judge or juror identifies the fact. However, media information highlights the problem of acceptability of individual inference. Consequently, reflections should be made on the reasons for case fact identification models to depend on inference, and in this regard the regulatory cultural functions of logic come to the front. In order to construct the case fact identification models suitable for China, the perspectives on cultural shifts should be accepted. In other words perfect dependence on procedures should be removed, and more emphasis should be laid on the reconciliation and transcendence of thinking habits so that case facts can be explained as a result of fact construction.

关 键 词：案件事实 文化学 逻辑 建构主义 

分 类 号：B81[哲学宗教—逻辑学]