讽刺言语行为的转喻研究  

A Metonymic Study of Sarcasm Speech Acts

作　　者：杨小敏[1] 祁世明[1] 

机构地区：[1]滁州学院外国语学院,安徽滁州239000

出　　处：《北京化工大学学报（社会科学版）》2015年第1期78-81,共4页Journal of Beijing University of Chemical Technology(Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：2014年全国高校外语教学科研项目"讽刺言语行为的转喻研究"(项目编号2014AH0034A)的阶段性成果;滁州学院科研启动基金资助项目"讽刺言语行为的转喻研究"(项目编号2014qd060)的阶段性成果;安徽省教育厅人文社科重点项目"基于语料汉语新词变异的概念整合研究"(项目编号SK2013A127)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：讽刺言语行为表面上积极肯定,本质上以迂回委婉的方式表达消极情感,其目的是对讽刺对象进行贬损、奚落和刺伤,是一种具有间接批评性质的表情类言语行为。讽刺言语行为在事态场境框架下进行运作,讽刺事态场境主要包括讽刺事态前段、讽刺事态核心段、讽刺事态效果段以及讽刺事态后段,各组成部分之间以及组成部分与整个讽刺事态场境之间都具有转喻关系。以场境框架为基础的转喻理论注重探讨讽刺言语行为的认知机理,同时对涉及到的语用推理图式和认知基础进行系统描述,可以较为合理地解释受话人为何能够迅速而轻松地推断出说话人的会话意图,具有重要的理论和现实意义。Sarcasm speech acts, being positive on surface yet implicitly critical in nature, is to disparage, ridicule and wound the feelings of the subject attacked. It operates within the State-of-affairs Scenarios and their illocutionary meaning can be analyzed in terms of sarcasm state-of-affairs scenarios composed of such four components as the BEFORE, the CORE and its EFFECT, and the AFTER, with each one standing for another or the whole scenario. Based on state-of-affairs scenarios, the illocutionary metonymy with its aims at exploring the cognitive mechanism, describing its pragmatic inferencing schema and cognitive foundation of sarcasm speech acts, explains why people arrive at the intended meaning so readily and effortlessly. Therefore, it is of theoretical significance and applicatory value.

关 键 词：讽刺言语行为 转喻 事态场境 阐释 

分 类 号：H314[语言文字—英语]