法律论证的推论规则  

Reference Rules of Legal Argumentation

作　　者：徐梦醒[1] 

机构地区：[1]中南财经政法大学法学院,湖北武汉430064

出　　处：《政法论丛》2015年第2期152-160,共9页Journal of Political Science and Law

摘　　要：法律论证的推论规则为论辩思维确立了逻辑导向。在司法实践中,法律断言的证成需要通过实体上和程序上的规范性作为支撑,从而推进特定合理意图作为决策要素的参考性甚至规范性要素。论辩对话在言说当中直接针对表述本身,而表述背后发挥规则性与机制性引导作用的,主要是论辩主体的论辩逻辑思维。法律论证的可废止性建立在论辩前提或者依据针对特定立场的论证力量上。盖然性推论普遍存在于证成结论而诠释因由的言说当中。通过层次性呈现论证推导的隐含前提,有助于论者识别、分析和评价其推论模式及其合理性和有效性。The rules of inference in legal argumentation has formulated the logical orientation for the thinking of argument. The justification of legal claims within legal practice requires the normativity as precondition from substantive and procedural laws,thereby prompting the reasonable intention as critical even normative factors for decision- making. The argument in discourse acts as and against statement itself,and it is the logical thinking of arguer works under the statements as regularity and guidance. The defeasibility of legal argument establishes itself on the strength of argumentation toward certain standpoint of premises,evidences and reasons. The enthymeme is widespread in development of utterance on justifying certain verdict while explaining the reasons and causes. By representing from various aspects the implicit premises of inference,it would be easier for arguer to identify,analyze and evaluate the inference model of legal argument and its reasonableness and effectiveness.

关 键 词：法律论证 推论规则 盖然性推论 

分 类 号：D90[政治法律—法学理论]