检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘小枫[1]
机构地区:[1]重庆大学人文社会科学高等研究院,重庆401331
出 处:《海南大学学报(人文社会科学版)》2015年第2期1-7,共7页Journal of Hainan University (Humanities & Social Sciences)
摘 要:17世纪末至18世纪初,欧洲知识界一场持续了半个世纪的"古今之争"不仅是文艺复兴与启蒙运动之间的连接点,而且标示出现代西方文明史的基本格局。然而,"古今之争"与"文艺复兴"两个文化史事件之间的内在关联究竟如何?通过分析布拉乔利尼、马基雅维利、勒华三位文艺复兴时期的人文主义学者及其论述,可说明文艺复兴的一个重要面相,进而阐明文艺复兴与古今之争的内在关联:"文艺复兴"时期西欧各日耳曼王国和城市共和国作为新政治单元的形成,是抑古崇今风气的真正起因,即是引发"古今之争"的生存论原因。The Quarrel of the Ancients and the Moderns began overtly as a literary and artistic debate heated up within European academia in the late 17 th century and continued to early 18 th century. This debate does not only connect Renaissance and Enlightenment,but also reveal the configuration of western modernization. Given this significance,however,the question of how this debate and Renaissance were connected remain undiscovered. By analyzing three significant figures and their works in Renaissance period,namely,Poggio Bracciolini,Niccolo Machiavelli,and Le Roy Ladurie,I find the connection lies in the emergence of a new kind of political unit——various Germanic kingdoms and republics in western Europe,which is the real reason for the quarrel of the Ancients and the Moderns.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3