检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:段德宁[1]
出 处:《中南大学学报(社会科学版)》2015年第2期182-187,共6页Journal of Central South University:Social Sciences
摘 要:"施为性"作为语言中以言行事的现象被语言哲学家提出,解构批评家们在文学研究中对其进行了开拓性的解释。随着施为性概念的扩展,图像作为一种符号无疑也具有施为的特性。在历史上图像就在人类社会中产生着崇拜信仰行为,成为显示权力塑造意识形态的一种方式。在图像化时代,图像更是通过其机械复制的特性刺激着大众的物欲,带来消费行为。作为不同类型的符号语言施为和图像施为之间既有共通之处又存在着差异,这一事实为我们在"图像化时代"审视文学与图像的关系提供了新的理论视角。As a phenomenon of doing things with words, linguistic philosophy brought in the concept of performative, which Deconstruction critics give a more extensional explanation in literary studies. With such extentions of the concept "performative," the visual image as a kind of sign is also performative. In human history, the visual image brought about the action to worship and believe, becoming a way of showing power and establishing ideology. In the visualized age, pictures evoke the mass's material desire and consuming behavior through mechanical reproduction. As the different symbol systems, the language performative and the picture performative have both the commonalities and the differences, which provides a new perspective to investigate the relation of literature and picture in the visualized a^e.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229