认知生成主义的方法论意义  

Methodological Implications in Cognitive Enactivism

作　　者：魏屹东[1] 武建峰[2] 

机构地区：[1]山西大学科学技术哲学研究中心,山西太原030006 [2]山西大学哲学社会学学院,山西太原030006

出　　处：《自然辩证法通讯》2015年第2期45-52,共8页Journal of Dialectics of Nature

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目"科学表征问题研究"(12BZX018)

摘　　要：生成主义是认知生态学奉行的认知研究纲领,它超越了传统的认知主义和联结主义。作为一种全新的认知哲学观,它在方法论上超越了传统的客观主义和建构主义,它自身蕴涵了以欧陆现象学和东方佛学静心修持传统为代表的第一人称方法,以生物学方法和动力学方法为代表的第三人称方法,以及基于一三人称整合的、以丹尼特的异类现象学和瓦雷拉的神经现象学为代表的第二人称方法,这是它特有的三种方法论。Enactivism is the guiding principle of cognitive research program and has gone beyond the traditional cognitivism and connectionism. As a completely new theory of cognitive philosophy, it has methodologically transcended the traditional ideas of objectivism and constructivism. It contains 3 main distinctive methodological approaches： the first-person methodology, typically represented by the traditions Of continental European phenomenology and Buddhist disciplines of meditation; the third-person methodology, typically represented by the biological methods and dynamical methods; and the second-person methodology based on the integration of the first- person and second-person methodologies and Dennett＇s heterophenomenology and Varela＇s Neurophenomenology. All the three methodologies are peculiar to cognitive enactivism.

关 键 词：认知生态学 生成主义 方法论 

分 类 号：N0[自然科学总论—科学技术哲学]