检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘睿[1] 周勇安[2] 卢强[2] 王俊卿[1] 郭克峰[1] 刘朝晖[1]
机构地区:[1]第四军医大学唐都医院康复理疗科,陕西西安710038 [2]第四军医大学唐都医院胸腔外科,陕西西安710038
出 处:《现代生物医学进展》2015年第15期2953-2956,共4页Progress in Modern Biomedicine
基 金:陕西省高等教育教学改革项目(13BY126)
摘 要:目的:探讨案例教学法在康复治疗师培训中的应用。方法:100名康复治疗师志愿者按从业时间分为低、中、高级治疗师,随后将不同资格的志愿者平均分配到传统教学法教学组(对照组)和案例教学法教学组(实验组),以脑性瘫痪的康复为主要内容开展培训。培训结束后,针对学员对基础知识的掌握和病例的分析进行考核。结果:实验组的学员基础知识的平均分高于对照组(P<0.05),并且对病例的分析能力也显著高于对照组(P<0.01)。调查问卷结果显示,多数实验组学员认为案例教学法能够调动学习积极性,并提高独立思考、分析问题的能力。结论:在康复医学教学中,案例教学法在激发学习兴趣、提高学习效率和学生综合素质方面优于传统的教学方法。Objective: To evaluate the application of case-based method (CBM) in rehabilitation therapist training. Methods: Total of 100 volunteers were divided into three classifications: junior, intermediate and senior. The volunteers in different classifications were equally separated into two groups: traditional teaching group (control group) and case-based method (CBM). The major content of the training was recovery of cerebral palsy. After the training, the basic knowledge and analyzing ability of the trainees were evaluated. Results: The average score of basic knowledge in CBM group was higher than that in contro~ group (P〈0.05). The analyzing ability of the trainees in CBM group was also higher than control group (P〈0.01). The results of the questionnaire showed that majority of the trainees approved CBM, because it stimulated the initiative, promoted the ability of independent thinking and analysis of the trainees. Conclusion: CBM is more effective in rehabilitation medicine education than traditional teaching.
分 类 号:G642[文化科学—高等教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.133.100.204