检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:储朝晖
机构地区:[1]中央教育科学研究院教育基本理论研究室,北京100088
出 处:《江汉大学学报(社会科学版)》2015年第2期99-105,127,共7页Journal of Jianghan University(Social Science Edition)
摘 要:政治思想品德是否加分是与其在高校招生中的定位直接相关的,也是与整个评价体系是否采用总分模式直接相关,这一做法延续有其历史渊源。60多年来,从有明确政治取向,甚至唯成份论的高校招生走向以维护所有社会成员的公平、公正为目标的高校招生是大势所趋。逆这一趋势的任何做法都难以获得公众认可,政治思想品德加分之所以备受质疑是由于这一做法与客观、公平、公正的准则直接冲突,以专业规则约束行政权力才是解决这一问题的有效路径。Whether to give bonus points to student candidates' political ideology and morality is directly related to the objective of higher education enrolment and also to whether the general appraisal system takes the aggregate score mode.The bonus point practice has its historical reasons. However,it is an irresistible trend that the higher education enrolment will shift from its ascendant political inclination to fairness and justice for all social members. This practice is controversial just because it is against the code of conduct:objectiveness,fairness,and justice. The effective method to solve this problem is to establish professional rules to put a curb on administrative powers.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.129.250.3