检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:邸妙词 刘儒德[1,2] 高钦[1] 王佳 魏军[3] 唐铭[1]
机构地区:[1]北京师范大学心理学院,北京100875 [2]应用实验心理北京市重点实验室,北京100875 [3]香港中文大学教育学院
出 处:《心理发展与教育》2015年第3期327-333,共7页Psychological Development and Education
基 金:国家科技支撑计划课题(2012BAI36B03)
摘 要:采用调节聚焦问卷、压力应对方式问卷和生活满意度问卷对北京市五所学校1174名小学生进行调查,考察调节聚焦对小学生压力应对方式、生活满意度的影响,并检验应对方式在调节聚焦和生活满意度之间的中介作用。结果发现:(1)促进定向对小学生生活满意度有显著正向预测作用,预防定向对生活满意度有显著负向预测作用;(2)积极应对和促进定向更相关,消极应对和预防定向更相关;(3)积极应对在促进定向和生活满意度之间起着完全中介的作用,积极应对、消极应对均在预防定向和生活满意度之间起着部分中介的作用。The present study investigated the antecedent role of regulatory foci in elementary school students' life satisfaction and coping strategies in response to stressful situations. Regulatory foci, coping style, and life satisfaction were assessed by self-reported measures in a sample of 1174 Chinese elementary school students. The structural equation modeling results revealed that: ( 1 ) Promotion focus presented significantly positive effect on life satisfaction, whereas prevention focus presented significantly negative effect on life satisfaction. (2) Correlation analysis indicated that positive coping style more associated with promotion focus than prevention focus, while negative coping style more associated with prevention focus than promotion focus. (3) Positive coping style fully mediated the relationship between promotion focus and life satisfaction, and both coping styles partially mediated the relationship between prevention focus and life satisfaction.
分 类 号:B844[哲学宗教—发展与教育心理学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117