从生态批评的三个层面看《虹》  

To See the "Rainbow" From the Three Aspects of eco Criticism

作　　者：任宇涛[1] 吴卓娅[1] 

机构地区：[1]大连理工大学外国语学院,辽宁大连116024

出　　处：《学理论》2015年第9期118-119,137,共3页Theory Research

摘　　要：由于人类生存环境的恶化,"生态"已经成为全世界共同关心的话题之一。《虹》作为文学经典,对其中自然、精神和社会三者之间关系的具体分析将有新的现实意义。以鲁枢元关于生态批评的自然、社会及精神生态三大方面对劳伦斯的作品《虹》进行解读,以求找到解决生态危机的方法。由于工业技术的介入,使得人类精神与自然精神的割裂,我们要回归自然,重建精神意识,才能有效缓解生态危机,实现社会生态,自然生态和精神生态和谐发展。Due to the worsening human survival environment,“ecology”has become one of the topics of common concerns in the world. Rainbow as a literary classic is studied from the perspective of the relationship between nature,spirit,and society,which will contribute to a new reality-oriented meaning. Based on Lu Shuyuan’s theory about natural,social and spiritual ecology in ecological criticism,Lawrence’s work,Rainbow is interpreted in these three aspects to find a way to solve the ecological crisis. The intervention of industrial technology makes the human spirit and the spirit of nature apart. If we can return to nature to rebuild spiritual consciousness,the ecological crisis can be effectively alleviated. Social,natural and spiritual ecology can be realized through their common harmonious development.

关 键 词：生态危机 自然 社会 精神 《虹》 

分 类 号：I02[文学—文学理论]