检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]西南财经大学会计学院 [2]西南财经大学-纽约巴鲁学院 [3]西南财经大学金融学院
出 处:《中国经济问题》2015年第3期74-87,共14页China Economic Studies
基 金:国家留学基金委"建设高水平大学公派研究生"项目(项目编号:201206980007)的资助
摘 要:本文以1999-2012年间上市公司中离职的经理人为样本来考察所披露的离职原因的信息含量和可靠度。我们发现,经营能力较差的经理人和职业经理人在离职时更倾向披露模糊的离职原因以维护其声誉;而在民营企业中,这种关系被显著加强。在进一步研究中,我们考察了披露模糊离职原因的经理人的收益和下一任期的经营状况。结果显示,模糊离职的经理人在下一期更容易被其他上市公司所聘用,但下一任期所任职公司的会计业绩也更差。最后,我们检验了市场是否能识别这种信息隐藏行为,通过事件研究法我们发现市场并不能识别经理人模糊离职的动机。本文的结论丰富了关于高管变更中披露行为的相关研究,为进一步建设我国经理人市场提供了理论参考。In this paper, we exploit the sample of CEO turnover to examine the informativeness and credibility of the reasons cited by CEOs for CEO turnover between 1999 and 2012 in China. We find that the possibility of ambiguous disclosure is negatively related to CEOs' capacity and professional manager identity. Such relationship is even stronger in private firms. Next we test benefits of ambiguous disclosure. We find CEOs who disclose ambiguous reasons are more likely to obtain jobs next year in other listed firms. However, future accounting performance of these firms is significantly weaker. Finally, we carry an event study to examine whether equity market could react to the misrepresentation; the result suggests that investors could not understand and respond to such event. Our results enrich the literature about CEO change and subsequent disclosure behavior and provide a reference for future construction of professional manager market system.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117

