检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王惠影[1,2] 刘毅[1] 王翠[1] 龚绍明[1] 姜涛[2] 吴华莉[1] 何大乾[1] 王良军[1]
机构地区:[1]上海市农业科学院畜牧兽医研究所,上海201106 [2]扬州大学动物科学与技术学院,扬州225009
出 处:《中国畜牧兽医》2015年第5期1152-1157,共6页China Animal Husbandry & Veterinary Medicine
基 金:现代农业产业技术体系建设专项资金(CARS-43-26);上海市科技兴农重点攻关项目资金(沪农科攻字(2009)第2-1号)
摘 要:为探讨乳酸菌在填饲过程中对朗德鹅产肝性能、脂肪沉积、屠体性能、养分表观消化率及血清生化指标的影响,试验选用108只健康、体重相近的12周龄朗德鹅,随机分为试验A组、试验B组和对照组,每组6个重复,每个重复6只。对照组填饲日粮为无乳酸菌菌液的基础日粮,试验A、B组于正式填饲前期(1~5d)分别在基础日粮中添加2000、3000g/t乳酸菌菌液;正式填饲中期(6~15d)分别在基础日粮中添加3000、5000g/t乳酸菌菌液;正式填饲后期(16~25d)不添加乳酸菌菌液。结果表明,与对照组相比,日粮中添加乳酸菌使填饲朗德鹅肥肝成熟期延长(P〈0.05),淘汰率降低;与对照组相比,日粮中添加乳酸菌使填饲朗德鹅肝脏脂肪沉积比例下降,试验B组肥肝重、肝脏重/(肠脂重+腹脂重)、肝脏重/填饲期增重显著降低(P〈0.05);各组间屠体性能指标均无显著性变化(P〉0.05);与对照组相比,试验B组粗脂肪表观消化率显著升高(P〈0.05),试验A、B组钙、磷的表观消化率显著升高(P〈0.05);与对照组相比,试验A、B组血清中甘油三酯、胆固醇和极低密度脂蛋白含量显著降低(P〈0.05)。综上所述,饲喂添加乳酸菌的日粮虽可促进鹅体健康,但会延缓鹅肝脏脂肪的沉积,不利于鹅肥肝生产。因此,生产中不宜在朗德鹅填饲日粮中添加乳酸菌。In order to study the effect of lactic acid bacterium on liver performance, fat deposition, slaughter performance, nutrient apparent digestibility and serum biochemical indices of Landes geese,a total of 108 12-week-age healthy Landes geese were selected and randomly divided into 3 groups with 6 replicates per group and 6 geese per replicate. The geese in control group were fed with the diets without lactic acid bacterium during t A and B were fed with the diets supplemented with ing 1 to 5 d,respectively;With 3 000 tic acid bacterium during 16 to 25 d. supplementation of lactic acid bacteri and 5 000 g/t d The results sh he whole experiment, and the geese in groups 2 000 and 3 000 g/t lactic acid bacterium dur- uring 6 to 15 d,respectively;And with no lac- owed um could prolong th that compared with the control group, e mature period of liver (P〈0.05) and decrease the elimination rate of Landes geese. Compared with the control group, supplementation of lactic acid bacterium could decrease the rate of fat on liver, the average weight of liver, liver weight/weight of bowel and abdominal fat and liver weight/weight gain in group B were signifi- cantly decreased (P〈 0. 05). There were no significant differences in slaughter performanceamong all groups (P〉0.05). Compared with the control group,the apparent digestibility of crude fat in group B was significantly increased (P〈0.05), the apparent digestibility of calcium and phosphorus in groups A and B were significantly increased (P〈0.05). Compared with the control group,the serum content of triglyceride,cholesterol and very low density lipoprotein in groups A and B were significantly decreased (P〈0.05). In conclusion, diets with lactic acid bacterium were good to geese, but considering its prevention of fat deposition in liver, lactic acid bacterium was suggested not to be used in force-feeding process.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15