印顺与牟宗三的真谛学判释之比较研究  

A Comparative Research on How YIN shun and MOU Zong-san interpreted Paramārtha's Buddhist Studies Respectively

作　　者：姜明泽[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京大学哲学系,北京100871

出　　处：《深圳大学学报（人文社会科学版）》2015年第2期79-89,共11页Journal of Shenzhen University：Humanities & Social Sciences

摘　　要：牟宗三将真谛"阿摩罗识自性清净心"解释为"心本清净",以此为核心观念,将其溯源至弥勒学,并综合真谛译著,赋予"阿摩罗自性清净心"以"本觉"义,最终将真谛学定位为"善绍弥勒学,而向真心派走"。印顺对牟宗三的真谛学判释做了回应,以"赖耶通真妄"一观念为真谛学之底里,将真谛学定位为"糅合如来藏学与瑜伽学";之后则明确拒绝将"阿摩罗自性清净心"视为"本觉"心、反对将其作《大乘起信论》式的解读,坚持真谛之基本立场为唯识学。印顺与牟宗三两位大师的真谛研究,是在"创造的诠释学"之"当谓"与"必谓"层次上的诠释活动,他们各自站在自身立场与教相判释的基础上,做融会贯通的工作,并提出了新课题,为我们呈现出真谛学的新面貌。比较印顺与牟宗三真谛学之判释,不仅可以帮助我们进一步拓宽真谛学的研究理路,寻求诠释真谛学的新路径;亦可以帮助我们考察两位重要学者的立场与方法在创造性诠释中所具有的具体诠释效果和意义。MOU Zong-san once suggested that Paramārtha＇s ”amala-vijnana （as a mind with purified self-nature）” should be understood as the mind was originally clean. He then traced this concept back to Maitreya Bodhisattva＇s teachings and regarded it as a kind of ”innate enlightenment”. Finally he concluded that Paramārtha＇s studies were ”following Maitreya and heading to ”true mind school”. To respond to MOU Zong-san, YIN shun argued the core of Paramārtha＇s thoughts was the idea that ”alaya can lead to either purified phenomena or contaminative phenomena” and defined Paramārtha＇ thoughts as the combination of Tathāgatagarbha （Buddha nature） and yogacara. After that he explicitly rejected to define amala-vijnana （as a mind with purified self-nature） as a kind of innate enlightenment, which was merely an interpretation using concepts from The Awakening of Mahayana Faith, and insisted that the fundamental position of Paramārtha＇s thoughts should be yogacara. The two academic masters＇ studies on Paramārtha exemplify ”creative hermeneutics”, which means both of them raised the potential yet necessary implications of Paramārtha＇s words and showed new possibilities of studies on Paramārtha. A comparison between YIN shun＇s and MOU Zong-san＇s interpretations of Paramārtha＇s thoughts can help us widen the research field of Paramārtha study and find new approaches to the interpretation of Paramārtha. Moreover, through the comparison we could better understand the two important scholars＇ different positions as well as the result and meaning of their creative hermeneutic methodology.

关 键 词：阿摩罗识 自性清净心 真谛学 唯识学 判释 

分 类 号：B2[哲学宗教—中国哲学]