反事实条件句自身特异性及其分析  

An Analysis on the Specialty of Counterfactual Conditionals

作　　者：王芳[1] 

机构地区：[1]福建师范大学福清分校经法系,福建福州350300

出　　处：《齐齐哈尔大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2015年第6期94-96,共3页Journal of Qiqihar University(Philosophy & Social Science Edition)

基　　金：福建省教育厅A类:信念修正;可能世界理论及反事实条件句(JA13359s)

摘　　要：反事实条件句的特异性表现在:用传统理论去解读反事实条件句会使一些事实上无效的推论模式合法化,而对某些逻辑上可信的推论形式反而核证不了。通过分析,强化前件原则、传递原则和假言易位原则,应用于反事实条件句并不失效。有"析取前件"的反事实条件句也可以另辟蹊径。Interpretation of counterfactual conditionals with the traditional theories is going to legalize the inference models which are factually invalid. It is still unable to prove those logically plausible. That is the specialty of counterfactual conditionals. Through the analysis, it proves that the principle of strengthening antecedents, transmission principle and the principle of hypothetical transloca- tion also take effect in the counterfaetual conditionals. The counterfactual conditionals of disjunctive antecedents can take a different tack.

关 键 词：反事实条件句 强化前件原则 传递原则 假言易位原则 析取前件 

分 类 号：B812[哲学宗教—逻辑学]