中国古代法官选任制度的特征及现代启示  

Features and Revelation of Judge Appointment System in Ancient China

作　　者：吴春雷[1] 司马守卫 

机构地区：[1]天津商业大学法学院,天津300134

出　　处：《渤海大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2015年第2期55-59,共5页Journal of Bohai University:Philosophy & Social Science Edition

基　　金：天津市哲学社会科学规划项目"中国古代法官制度研究"的结项成果(项目编号:Tjfx08-047)

摘　　要：纵览中国古代法官选任制度的历史演进过程,可以发现很多与现代法官选任制度不同的特点。在选任标准上重视候选人的道德品质而轻视法律知识素养;在选任方式上不拘一格,一般以一种选任方式为主,辅之以其他几种次要的选任方式;在选任制度的实施过程中,常出现制度异化的现象。对于这些特点的认识,可以推动对我国现代法官选任的反思和改进。我国现代法官选任应以知识和能力考查为主,不宜过分强调选任时的道德认定;应当拓宽法官选任渠道,探索从法律学者和律师中选任法官的特殊机制;法官选任制度的设计和完善过程中应当谨防制度异化。By reviewing the history of judge appointment system in ancient China, it is found that there exist many different features in ancient China from modern judge appointment system. In ancient China, the judge appointment focused on the morality of the candidates, one main appointment way in addition to other ways and the alienation to the existed appointment system. Those features help to promote the development of current system of judge appointment in China. In China, judge appointment should focus on the knowledge and capacity of the candidates, not on their moral standards. The judges should be chosen from legal scholars and lawyers, and the appointment system should be perfected to avoid the alienation of the system.

关 键 词：古代法官 选任制度 选任标准 选任方式 

分 类 号：D926.2[政治法律—法学]