我国第三人撤销之诉若干问题的新思考  

New thinking on suit for the third party to revoke judgment in China

作　　者：胡军辉[1] 张瑞鑫[1] 

机构地区：[1]湘潭大学法学院,湖南湘潭411105

出　　处：《中南大学学报（社会科学版）》2015年第3期86-92,共7页Journal of Central South University：Social Sciences

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目"第三人撤销之诉研究"(13YJA820012);湘潭大学法学院研究生科研创新项目"诉讼调解瑕疵及其救济途径"(FXYCX003)

摘　　要：第三人撤销之诉程序有四种不同的类型,我国立法规定的是独立型第三人撤销之诉程序。在性质上,第三人撤销之诉既属于事前救济程序又属于事后救济程序。在审级利益的保护上,当事人之间存在不可避免的不对等,需要对相关救济程序进行特殊的设置以达到适度平衡的目的。第三人撤销之诉的制度目的和功能定位具有复合性,但应当突出其纠错功能、事后救济功能和实体救济功能。我国现行法对第三人撤销之诉的程序设置并不够完善,仍需要对其进行进一步的修改。There are four different types of suit for the third party to revoke judgment. Under the Chinese Legislation, such suit is independent suit of the third party. In essence, it is the pre-action of aiding procedure and post-action of legal remedy procedure. As to the protection of interests at the case-hearing level, there inevitably exist discrepancies between plaintiff and defendant. Hence, we need to set up special relevant relief procedures in order to achieve a proper balance. The suit for the third party to revoke judgment is complex in its purposes and functions, but should be highlighted in its functions including correcting errors, afterwards relief and entity relief. In our current legislation, such suit still has inadequacies in procedures, and further modifications need to be made.

关 键 词：第三人撤销之诉 程序类型与性质 审级利益 功能定位 程序完善 

分 类 号：D915[政治法律—诉讼法学]