理念化与危机——兼及胡塞尔的欧洲中心主义  

Idealization and Crisis:On Husserl's Eurocentrism

作　　者：徐立文[1] 

机构地区：[1]中山大学哲学系,广东广州510275

出　　处：《山西大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2015年第4期30-35,共6页Journal of Shanxi University(Philosophy and Social Science Edition)

摘　　要：文章首先分析了理念化在近代自然科学之形成中的作用,在此基础上澄清古代的理念化和近代的理念化之间的差异,正是这些差异构成了近代欧洲科学危机和欧洲人性危机产生的原因。要克服这些危机,我们必须回溯到生活世界和超越论主体性的根基之上。在这种回溯的过程中,胡塞尔发展了其理性目的论的历史哲学研究。虽然这一切都是针对"欧洲"这一精神共同体而阐明的,但是由于欧洲的典范作用,其危机及对危机的克服不再独属于欧洲,而是对其他文明的发展也有重要的借鉴意义。The article first analyses the role the idealization plays in modem natural science, and then clarifies the differences between ancient and modem idealization. It is these differences that cause scientific crisis and human crisis in modem Europe. It is necessary to trace back to the basis of life - world and transcendental subjectivity if we want to overcome these crisis. In the process of this tracing, Husserl developed his rational teleology and philoso- phy of history. Although all these analyses are about the spiritual community of ＂Europe＂, it is also of great impor- tance to other civilizations, because Europe is a remarkable example for them

关 键 词：理念化 欧洲危机 生活世界 超越论主体性 目的论 

分 类 号：B516.52[哲学宗教—外国哲学]