外语语法学习中书面纠错反馈研究回顾与展望  

An analysis of the efficiency of written corrective feedbackon grammar acquisition

作　　者：蔡远顺[1] 谢元花[2] 

机构地区：[1]广东医学院外国语学院,广东东莞523808 [2]广东外语外贸大学英文学院,广东广州510420

出　　处：《湖北师范学院学报（哲学社会科学版）》2015年第4期131-136,共6页Journal of Hubei Normal University（Philosophy and Social Science）

基　　金：2013年度广东医学院教育教学研究课题(JY1363);国家社科基金项目(13BYY082);广东省社科共建项目(GD12XWW02);广东省高等教学改革项目(GDJG20142195)

摘　　要：近三十年外语写作界一直争论书面纠错反馈对语法习得的效果。本文梳理了该领域相关文献,旨在为国内的研究提供启示。首先阐述了Truscott和Ferris引领的两大流派截然相反的观点。其次,论证了至今大部分实证研究肯定书面纠错反馈的作用,不同纠错方式有不同效果。最后,本文建议未来研究采用科学研究方法,围绕以下两个主流趋势展开:1)考察聚焦书面纠错中不同纠错方式对习得各种语法结构的效果;2)对比聚焦与非聚焦书面纠错对语法习得的不同效果。There has been a debate in L2 writing about the efficiency of written corrective feedback（ WCF） on grammar acquisition in the last three decades. By reviewing related literature,this paper aims to shed light on research about WCF in China.It begins with a general introduction of the contrasting ideas of the two groups respectively represented by Truscott and Ferris,then expounds the fact that most empirical studies have proved the positive effect of WCF,and that different correction types have diverse results in various empirical studies. Finally the paper concludes with suggestions on the adoption of scientific research methodology and conducting research in the following two directions in the future：（ 1） studying the efficiency of focused WCF on the acquisition of more grammar structures;（ 2） comparing effects between focused and unfocused WCF on grammar acquisition.

关 键 词：书面纠错反馈 外语写作 语法习得 效果 

分 类 号：G642.0[文化科学—高等教育学]