检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈雷[1] 林柏梁[1] 王龙[1] 温旭红[1] 李建[1]
出 处:《北京交通大学学报》2015年第3期70-75,共6页JOURNAL OF BEIJING JIAOTONG UNIVERSITY
基 金:中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助(2014YJS085)
摘 要:研究了基于碳减排政策的多式联运运输方式选择问题.通过引入碳税机制,构建了数学规划模型.模型中以货物运输成本、转运成本以及在运输和转运过程中产生的碳排放成本最小化为目标函数,以货运过程中的碳排放总量限制、运到时间约束、相邻节点间只能选择一种货运方式以及节点内只能选择一种转运方案等为约束条件.最后,以鄂尔多斯到上海的多式联运为背景设计了算例,利用VC++6.0调用Lingo11.0实现模型的求解,并通过进一步加强碳排放总量的限制进行模型求解的对比分析,获得更加符合国家碳减排政策倡导的优化结果,验证了所建模型的合理性.This paper studied the optimization of mode selection for the intermodal transportation based on the carbon-reduction policy. A mathematical programming model was built by the introduction of a carbon tax mechanism. The proposed model was to minimize the costs of transportation and transfer of the freight flow,and the cost of the carbon emissions produced during these processes. The constraints of the model were set as the total carbon emissions,the limitation of time when transported to the end node,only one transportation mode can be chose between adjacent nodes and only one transfer scheme can be chose in one node. Finally,a numerical case based on intermodal transportation form Erdos to Shanghai was given. An optimization result was achieved by invoking Lingo11. 0 optimization platform in VC + + 6. 0 software. For comparison purposes,the limit of carbon emissions was strengthened and an optimization result which was more consistent with the national carbon emission reduction policy was achieved. Thus,the validity and feasibility of the proposed model was verified.
分 类 号:U15[交通运输工程] X16[环境科学与工程—环境科学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222