检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]第三军医大学护理学院基础护理学教研室,重庆市400038
出 处:《中国护理管理》2015年第7期828-831,共4页Chinese Nursing Management
基 金:重庆市高等教育教学改革研究项目(1203113)
摘 要:目的 :评价护理学基础课程模块化的应用效果。方法 :2012级38名护理本科生为试验组,按照改革后的护理学基础一门课程5个模块进行教学,5个模块分别是模块Ⅰ-感性认识护理、模块Ⅱ-护理学基本理论、模块Ⅲ-一般性护理知识、模块Ⅳ-治疗性护理知识、模块Ⅴ-护理技能综合培训。2010级49名护理本科生作为对照组,按照改革前的专业思想教育——了解临床、护理学导论、基础护理学、集中见习与岗前培训4门独立课程进行教学。结果 :实施护理学基础课程模块化改革后,2012级护生结课时的平均成绩为(86.50±5.02)分、优良率占49.4%、课程总体满意度评分为(98.40±0.71)分,平均成绩、优良率与改革前实施传统课程设置的2010级护生比较无统计学差异(P>0.05),但是课程满意度高于改革前对照组(P<0.01)。结论 :护理学基础课程模块化改革通过对教学内容的重组实现减课程(4门减至1门)及减课时(总学时由290学时调整至260学时)的目标,应用后保持了较好的学习效果,且得到学生高满意度反馈。Objective: To explore the effect of the modular curriculum in fundamental nursing science. Methods: Grade 2012 nursing undergraduate students(n=38), as experimental group, performed the reformed curriculum setting of one curriculum with 5 modules in fundamental nursing science for teaching. Grade 2010 nursing students(n=49), as control group, performed the prereformed curriculum setting of four independent courses for teaching. Results: The final scores and the excellent and good rates had no significant differences between the experimental group and the control group(P〉0.05). But the satisfaction score with the curriculum in the experimental group was higher than the control group(P〈0.01). Conclusion: The modular curriculum reform in basic nursing science maintained the high learning effects, and received the high satisfaction feedback from students.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30