输入理论视阈下研究生英语阅读的有效输入方式——地方性高校非英语专业硕士研究生英语阅读研究  

The Effective English Reading Input for Postgraduate Students Based on Input Hypothesis——A Research on the English Reading of Non-English Major Postgraduate Students from a Local University

作　　者：王骏[1] 陆军[1] 

机构地区：[1]扬州大学外国语学院,江苏扬州225009

出　　处：《天津外国语大学学报》2015年第4期49-55,共7页Journal of Tianjin Foreign Studies University

基　　金：江苏省教育厅高校哲学社会科学研究基金指导项目"基于英语文献阅读的学术英语语言习得研究"(2014SJD708);扬州大学人文社科基金项目"地方综合性大学研究生英语阅读动机与阅读策略相关性研究"(XJJ2013-29)

摘　　要：研究生英语阅读主要包括文献英语、考试英语和通用英语阅读。参照Krashen的输入假说,研究生考试英语和通过英语阅读的相关性和输入量均很低。相比之下,文献英语阅读具有良好相关性、输入量和可理解性,比较符合输入假说,可以成为培养研究生英语阅读能力的有效载体。鉴于输入假说对语言形式关注的不足,可以适当借鉴重形式学派的观点采用专业导师和英语教师合作的教学模式引导学生在阅读学术英语过程中对语言形式予以适当关注。English reading of postgraduate students consists of EGP reading, exam-oriented reading and the reading of academic journals. By the input hypothesis of Krashen, EGP and exam-oriented reading are quite low in terms of relevance and the volume of input. By contrast, the reading of academic journals, with a high level of relevance, input and understandability, meets the requirements of input hypothesis. Therefore, it may turn out an effective way of breeding postgraduate students＇ English reading competence. The input hypothesis, however, is deficient in the attention paid to language form. This can be mended by the proposals made by the focus-on-form school. Specifically, academic teachers and English teachers should combine their efforts to lead postgraduate students to pay considerable attention to language form in the process of reading English-delivered academic journals.

关 键 词：文献英语 输入假说 图式 

分 类 号：H319.3[语言文字—英语]