检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《临床护理杂志》2015年第3期54-56,共3页Journal of Clinical Nursing
基 金:成都中医药大学重点教改资助项目(JGZD201208)
摘 要:目的调查本科护生评判性思维与应对方式的现况,并分析两者之间的关系。方法采用评判性思维量表中文版(CTDI-CV)与简易应对方式问卷(SCSQ),对252名本科护生进行横断面研究。结果本科护生的评判性思维能力总分为(275.72±28.44),积极应对得分为(2.00±0.50),消极应对得分为(1.35±0.47);应对方式得分与评判性思维能力得分存在相关性,有显著性差异(P<0.05,P<0.01)。结论护生应对方式对评判性思维能力的发展具有一定正向影响,本科护生的评判性思维能力有待进一步提高。Objective To explore the current situation and analyze the correlation between critical thinking disposition and coping style in undergraduate nursing student.Methods A survey is conducted with questionnaires including CTDICV and SCSQ to explore the current situation of critical thinking disposition and coping style of 252 undergraduate nursing students,in conjunction with an analysis of correlation between critical thinking disposition and coping style.Results The total score of critical thinking disposition is 275.72±28.44,positive coping style score is 2.00±0.50,negative coping style score is 1.35±0.47.Critical thinking disposition has a correlation with coping style,which is of statistical significance(P〈0.05,P〈0.01).Conclusion Coping style of graduate nursing student has a positive effect on the development of critical thinking disposition.Further improvement of undergraduate nursing students' critical thinking disposition is necessary.
分 类 号:R192.6[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15