我国侦查权性质探析  

A probe into the nature of investigation power of our country

作　　者：何明凤[1] 蔡家华[1] 

机构地区：[1]广西民族大学法学院,广西南宁530006

出　　处：《新余学院学报》2015年第4期50-53,共4页Journal of Xinyu University

基　　金：广西研究生教育创新计划<新加坡反贪污贿赂刑事立法及启示>(YCSW2014131)

摘　　要：侦查权性质的确定对我国刑事诉讼程序的改革与完善具有重要意义。法学界针对我国侦查权性质的确定仍有很大争议,主流学说包括"行政权说"、"司法权说"、"双重属性说",但这些学说都不能准确概括侦查权的本质属性。侦查机关的性质和职能不同,侦查权性质也不同,检察机关的侦查权属于法律监督权,而其他机关的侦查权属于行政权。The definition of the nature of investigation power is of great significance to the reform and perfection of our criminal procedure. It is argued in our law circle. The main theories include administration power theory, judicial power theory and dual nature theory, but these theories can not accurately generalize the nature of investigation power. The investigation organizations with different nature and functions have different nature of investigation power. The investigation power of procuratorate belongs to legal supervision power while other organizations＇ investigation power belongs to administration power.

关 键 词：侦查权性质 行政权说 司法权说 双重属性说 多元属性说 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]