检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:付艳芬[1] 王剑华[2] 高学燕 何尹来[4] 杨红飞[4]
机构地区:[1]大理学院护理学院,云南大理671000 [2]大理学院临床医学院,云南大理671000 [3]大理州妇幼保健院,云南大理671000 [4]大理学院附属医院,云南大理671000
出 处:《大理学院学报(综合版)》2015年第8期61-64,共4页Journal of Dali University
基 金:云南省教育厅科研基金资助项目(2010C146);大理学院博士启动基金资助项目(KYBS201101)
摘 要:目的:测试工作倦怠量表中文版在少数民族地区护士中使用的信度和效度。方法:对MBI工作倦怠量表在大理白族自治州592名护士中进行使用,评价其信度和效度。结果:因子分析结果显示,个人成就感降低因子的条目和原量表一致,但是原量表中的条目6、条目16和条目20已由情绪耗竭维度划归到人格解体维度。全量表同质信度为0.834,3个维度Cronbachd系数为0.787~0.807;计算各条目与各维度间的相关,各条目与所属维度之间相关较强,而与其他维度相关较弱。结论:本研究显示工作倦怠问卷中文版信度较好。但从因子分析来看,与原量表不完全一致,因此,对少数民族地区护士进行调查时,建议先对量表进行修订。Objective: To test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI) in nurses at minority districts. Methods: MBI was tested by 592 nurses in Dali Prefecture to evaluate the reliability and validity. Results: Factor analysis showed that the item of diminished personal accomplishment was in accordance with the original scale, but item 6, 16, and 20 in the original scale were moved from emotional exhaustion dimension to depersonalization. The reliabilities of internal consistency of the inventory was 0.834, and the three dimensions (depersonalization, emotional exhaustion, sense of achievement) ranged from 0.787 to 0.807. The correlation between each item and its dimension was stronger than the item with other dimensions. Conclusion: The reliability of the Chinese version of MBI is acceptable. But the construct is different from the original inventory. So if we want to investigate the nurses in minority district, we have to revise the scale firstly.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38