检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王志刚[1]
出 处:《河北法学》2015年第11期47-56,共10页Hebei Law Science
基 金:2014年度国家社科基金项目<刑事DNA取样与人权保障研究>(14XFX024);第二批重庆市高等学校青年骨干教师资助计划项目<网络犯罪治理中的证据收集和运用规则研究>
摘 要:由于网络犯罪横跨虚拟和现实两个空间,使得它在调查取证以及证明体系上迥异于传统犯罪。具体而言,网络犯罪案件中认定被追诉人身份的证据困境表现为认定方式的间接性、证据体系的脆弱以及证明结论的非排他性。当前可通过建立补强证据规则来解决上述问题。通过补强证据规则的建立,不仅能够增强电子数据的证明力、强化证明体系的稳定性,还有利于电子数据运用规则的完善。构建补强证据规则是一个系统性设计,它既需要对补强证据的来源进行明确,还需要对补强证据的调查以及待补强对象进行限定,同时也有赖于刑事推定机制的引入。As the cybercrime across the virtual and real space,making it vitually different of the traditional crime in investigation,evidence collection and proof system. Specifically,the dilemma of proof in Identification of the accused in cybercrime is fully exhibited in indirect evidence, system vulnerability and non-exclusive conclusion. At present,the above problems can be solved through the establishment of corroboration rule. Through the establishment of the corroboration rule,not only can strengthen the proof strength of the electronic data,strengthen the stability of the proof system,but also promote perfection of the rule of electronic data use. Construction of the rule of corroboration is a systemic design. It not only needs to clearly define the source of corroboration evidence,,also needs to define the the investigation procedure and reinforcing objects to be reinforced. At the same time,the above system is also rely on the introduction of the mechanism of criminal presumption.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3