从实证到理论:论我国刑事庭前会议的听证模式  

From Empiricism to Theory:A Study of the Hearing Model in the Criminal Pretrial Conference

作　　者：贾志强[1] 

机构地区：[1]吉林大学法学院,吉林长春130012

出　　处：《新疆大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2015年第4期49-56,共8页Journal of Xinjiang University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)

基　　金：中国法学会部级课题"推进以审判为中心的诉讼制度改革研究"(CLS[2015]C07);国家社会科学基金一般项目"刑事诉讼证明模式研究"(11BFX111);吉林大学研究生创新研究计划项目(2014077)

摘　　要：刑事庭前会议上如何处理程序性争议,我国立法规定较为模糊。我国司法实践中已出现了庭前会议的听证模式,庭前会议被作为一种专门的程序性争议解决程序,控辩双方可就非法证据排除等程序性争议展开对抗、辩论,法官居中裁判。与我国目前立法中的程序性争议解决机制相比,听证模式下的庭前会议是一种更优的选择。庭前会议听证模式应发展成为一种专门解决"排非"等程序性争议的庭前听证程序,并以被告人的人权保障为核心构建相关具体规则。China＇s Criminal Procedural Law is unclear about how to resolve procedural disputes in the criminal pretrial conference.It is found that the hearing model in the criminal pretrial conference has been practiced in China＇s judicial practice.Being a special procedure for resolving procedural disputes,the prosecution and defense can confront and argue on issues such as illegal evidence exclusion,and the judge make decisions as an impartial party.Compared with the mechanism for resolving procedural disputes in the present legislation,this model is a better choice.In the future,this hearing model should be developed into a special pretrial hearing for resolving procedural disputes,especially for suppression issue,and relevant rules should be made centering on the protection of defendants＇ human rights.

关 键 词：庭前会议 听证模式 程序性争议 非法证据排除 庭前听证 

分 类 号：D925[政治法律—诉讼法学]