体育专业排球基础课中三种教学方式的学习结果分析  

On Analysis of Learning Effects of Three Teaching Styles in Fundamental Volleyball Classes Majoring in Physical Education

作　　者：李会明[1] 李少华[1] 

机构地区：[1]云南农业大学体育学院,昆明650201

出　　处：《西南师范大学学报（自然科学版）》2015年第10期204-208,共5页Journal of Southwest China Normal University(Natural Science Edition)

基　　金：云南农业大学"百名"青年学术与技术带头人资助项目(2012PY18)

摘　　要：对92名参加排球基础课学习的体育专业学生进行练习式、互惠式和包含式教学下的学习结果比较,对学生的发球、垫球和传球技能进行测定,结果显示:练习式教学下男生的平均综合评分显著高于互惠式和包含式教学下的评分(p<0.01),互惠式和包含式教学下女生的平均综合评分显著高于练习式教学下的评分(p<0.01),互惠式教学与包含式教学之间学生的平均综合评分无显著性差异.2种性别、3种教学方式与学习结果的2×3独立组方差分析发现,性别—教学方式相互作用对学习结果影响较大,男生的最优教学方式为练习式,女生的最优教学方式为包含式.The study investigated learning effects of 92 students,who major in physical education,enrolled in fundamental volleyball skill classes in three teaching models,such as practice,reciprocal,and inclusion style.After eight classes,passing,setting,and serving skills were assessed,the whole scores on the three aspects constituted a comprehensive score that represented students＇ learning effects.Results show that the mean comprehensive score of the practice group for man was significantly（p〈0.01）higher than that of the reciprocal and inclusion groups.The mean comprehensive score of the reciprocal and inclusion groups for female was significantly（p〈0.01）higher than that of the practice group,respectively.No significant difference in the mean comprehensive score was found between the reciprocal and inclusion groups for all.After analyzing the effects of genders and three teaching styles on the learning effects by analysis of Variance,the findings indicated that gender/teaching style has a large impact on the learning results,the best teaching style was practice style for man,while inclusion style for female.

关 键 词：教学方式 排球技能 体育专业 

分 类 号：G807[文化科学—体育训练]