不同组卷方式下HSK(四级)题目质量比较研究  

A Comparative Study of HSK4 Test Project Quality under Two Different Test-paper Assembly Ways

作　　者：卢双双 彭杰 刘小龙 

机构地区：[1]汉考国际教育科技(北京)有限公司

出　　处：《中国考试》2015年第11期58-63,共6页journal of China Examinations

摘　　要：本文从难度、信度、区分度和结构效度四个方面比较了人工组卷和自动组卷的HSK(四级)试卷(以下简称人工卷和自动卷)的题目质量。研究结果显示,自动卷和人工卷的题目质量较好,在结构效度的模型拟合度上,自动卷结构效度能很好规避书写1部分对阅读理解能力的考查,拟合参数好于人工卷。结果说明计算机自动组卷成功,自动卷可对考生的汉语应用能力准确测量,可用于正式考试。The article compared the project quality of HSK4 test paper assembled by content expert with automatically assembled test paper （Hereinafter referred to as ＂expert paper＂ and ＂automatic paper＂ ）. The project quality analysis includes the difficulty, reliability, discrimination, and the validity of projects. The results showed that both the two test papers had high project quality. In the model fitting for validity assessment, the results of automatic paper indicated that automatic paper could avoid the Writing One part＇ s investigation of the candidates＇ reading comprehension ability. Finally, the author concludes that automated test assembly program is a success. Automatic test papers can have accurate measurement of test takers＇ Chinese application ability and can be applied to the test in the future.

关 键 词：HSK 自动组卷 人工组卷 题目质量 

分 类 号：G405[文化科学—教育学原理]