检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:宋亚辉[1,2] 何莉[3] 巩振兴[1,2] 张剑[1,2]
机构地区:[1]北京科技大学东凌经济管理学院,北京100083 [2]国土资源人才评价开放实验室,北京100812 [3]北京师范大学心理学院,北京100875
出 处:《浙江大学学报(理学版)》2015年第6期652-659,703,共9页Journal of Zhejiang University(Science Edition)
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(71071017);教育部人文社会科学研究规划项目资助(115YJA630099)
摘 要:员工创造性绩效影响机制的研究缺乏对认知、动机和情感机制交互作用的探讨,工作激情是进行3种影响机制融合研究的最佳变量.以204名企业员工及其对应主管为研究对象,采用两时点滞后的纵向研究方法,以激情二元模型为基础,以认知投入、成就目标导向和情绪调节作为代表变量,对员工工作激情影响创造性绩效的认知、动机和情感机制的整合路径进行研究.结果表明:和谐的工作激情同时通过动机通道(掌握趋近目标导向)和情感通道(认知重评与表达抑制两种情绪调节策略)作用于认知机制(认知投入),进而影响创造性绩效;强迫的工作激情仅通过动机通道(绩效趋近目标导向与绩效回避目标导向)作用于认知机制(认知投入),进而影响创造性绩效.It is lack of exploration on the interaction effective of cognitive,motivational and emotional mechanism in the study on the influence mechanism of creative performance of employees.Work passion is the most proper variable for the integrated study on the above three mechanisms.Aiming at the dynamic influence process of work passion on creative performance,two time points longitudinal method was used in the present study.Based on dualistic model of passion,using cognitive engagement,achievement goal orientation and emotion regulation as representative variables,the present study explored the integrated path of cognitive,motivational and emotional mechanism between work passion and creative performance.By surveying 204 employees and their corresponding supervisors,results showed that harmonious work passion influenced on the cognitive path through both motivational and emotional paths,in turn,on creative performance.While obsessive work passion influenced on the cognitive path only through motivational path,which in turn impacted on the creative performance of employees.
分 类 号:B849[哲学宗教—应用心理学] C93[哲学宗教—心理学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.142.52.141