检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘卉[1] 徐萍[1] 邹波[1] 张卫[1] 王海银
机构地区:[1]上海市松江区中心医院,上海市201699 [2]上海市卫生发展研究中心,上海市200032
出 处:《江苏卫生事业管理》2015年第6期40-42,共3页Jiangsu Health System Management
摘 要:目的为医院制定和完善预约服务策略和措施提供依据。方法上海市某二级医院2014年7—9月间随机调查门诊预约病人的年龄结构、患者类型、预约情况及满意度等,比较不同预约方式下预约时间及满意度等差异。结果共调查403例,45岁以上病例占67.5%,复诊病人占73.4%,专家门诊预约比例为73.9%。现场、电话、“一站式”3种不同预约方式预约时间差异有统计学意义(X2=141.03,P〈0.01),不同预约方式下总体满意度间有差异(P〈0.05)。结论不同预约方式预约效率不同,门诊预约仍需要进一步改进。Objective: To provide information for hospitals to develop the service strategy and measures through exploring ap- pointment status and problems in outpatient clinic in one secondary hospital in Shanghai. Methods: One secondary hospital in Shanghai was selected and the outpatient appointments from July to September in 2014 was investigate randomly. Age structure, patient types, appointment situation and satisfaction of the outpatient appointments were analyzed. The differences of waiting time and satisfaction between different appointments were compared. Results: 403 patient appointments were investigated, while patients over the age of 45, further consultation patients and specialist service for outpatients were separately accounted for 67.5 %, 73.4% and 73.9%. There was significant differences in appointment time between different appointment modes: on - the - spot, telephone and machine (X2 = 141.03,P 〈 0.01 ), and statistically significant was also shown in waiting time and overall satisfaction(P 〈 0.05 ). Conclusions: Different efficiency was shown for the three methods to make an appointment, hospital appointment service should be improved and strengthened.
分 类 号:R197.32[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28