检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:姚洁[1] 韩品[1] 张蕴秀[1] 任伟[1] 陈金美[1] 王培昌[1]
机构地区:[1]首都医科大学宣武医院实验诊断学教研室,100053
出 处:《中华医学教育探索杂志》2015年第11期1098-1101,共4页Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research
基 金:首都医科大学校长研究基金教育教学改革立项课题(10JYY-096)
摘 要:目的探讨网络互动教学在《实验诊断学》课程教学中的应用与效果。方法选择2009级临床医学系学生65人,随机分为2个组,实验组31人,对照组34人。对照组教学形式为:课堂教学+校级精品网络课程。实验组教学形式为:课堂教学+校级精品网络课程+网络互动。课程学习结束,对学生进行考核及问卷调查以评价教学效果,应用独立样本t检验比较统计学差异。结果实验组理论考试成绩得分高于对照组(87.20±5.25VS.82.69±5.76),差异有统计学意义(P=0.002);简答题、病例分析题实验组学生成绩得分均较对照组高(26.16±1.57VS.25.31±1.73,18.94±1.05VS.15.53±1.15),有统计学差异(P=0.043,P=-.000)。问卷调查评分表中学习兴趣、实时解惑、学习效果、分析能力、协作精神培养的满意度评分(4.30±0.65vs.3.97±0.62,4.63±0.49VS.3.25±0.88,4.43±0.57VS.3.49±0.65,4.46±0.57VS.3.37±0.73,4.33±0.66VS.3.68±0.58),实验组高于对照组(P=-0.041,0.000,0.000,0.000,0.000)。结论网络互动应用于实验诊断学教学,可以实现实时讨论及解惑,对增加学生对课程的重视程度、提高学习兴趣及学习成绩有一定的积极意义。Objective In order to investigate the impact of interactive online teaching in Lab- oratory Diagnosis, a randomized experimental study was conducted among the medical students in Grade 2009. Methods A total of 65 subjects were randomized into the experimental group (N=31) and the control group (N=34). In addition to the standard in-class presentation/discussion and school-wide refined online courses offered in the control group, interactive online teaching was added to experi- mental group. After completion of the course, the impact of interactive online teaching in the experi- mental group was compared to that in the control group through a final exam and a question-naire concentrating on motivation of study, problem solving and team working skills. Statistical signifi-cance of the comparison was evaluated using t-test. Results The results from the final exam showed that the average score in the experimental group was higher than the control group (87.20 ± 5.25 vs. 82.69 ± 5.76), It is statistically significant (P=0.002). The average scores of short answer and case study ques- tions in the experimental group was higher than the control group (26.16 ± 1.57 vs. 25.31± 1.73, 18.94± 1.05 vs. 15.53 ± 1.15), It is statistically significant (P=0.043,P=0.000). The satisfaction evaluation of interest in learning, timely answers to questions, learning, analytical skills, teamwork culture reflected by the questionnaire indicated statistically higher (P=0.041,0.000,0.000,0.000,0.000) average scores in the experimental group as compared to its counterparts in the control group (4.30 ± 0.65 vs. 3.97± 0.62, 4.63 ±0.49 vs. 3.25 ± 0.88, 4.43 ±0.57 vs. 3.49 ± 0.65, 4.46 ± 0.57 vs. 3.37 ± 0.73, 4.33±0.66 vs. 3.68 ± 0.58). Conclusion Interactive online teaching helps to improve the study performance of medical students in Laboratory Diagnosis. Incorporating interactive online teaching into the currentcourse regarding Laboratory Diagnosis merits recommendation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229