检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:田瑞强[1] 袁军鹏[1] 朱梦皎[2] 潘云涛[1]
机构地区:[1]中国科学技术信息研究所,北京100038 [2]同济大学图书馆,上海200092
出 处:《全球科技经济瞭望》2015年第12期1-6,20,共7页Global Science,Technology and Economy Outlook
基 金:国家软科学研究计划项目“国外科技人才发展趋势比较研究”(2012GXS5D127)、国家科技支撑计划项目“面向科技情报分析的信息服务资源开发与支撑技术研究”(2015BAH25F01).
摘 要:针对高层次科技人才的特点,研究了不同层次人才的确定标准,建立多角度、多元的可靠的评价机制,利用层次分析法确定了各指标的权重,为我国人才引进工作提供了评价依据。本文将科技人才分为三个层级:顶尖科学家、杰出科学家、优秀科学家。顶尖科学家是人才引进中重点关注的对象,杰出科学家有成长为顶尖科学家的潜力,而优秀科学家是人才引进时的最低限,保证引进的人才在国际、国内的学术水平在均值以上。综合考虑了科技人才的成长阶段、所处的不同学科差异,并突出科技人才在本学科的学术声誉、杰出的学术素质等因素,提出了科技人才的分层评价指标体系。In view of the characteristics of overseas high-level scientific and technological talents, the paper studies the standards of dividing different levels of talents, establishing a reliable evaluation mechanism with multi-angle and diversification. Hierarchy analytic method is used in determining the weight of each index. Those provide the basis for the introduction of professional talents in China. In this paper, the S&T talents are divided into three levels: top scientists, outstanding scientists, and brilliant scientists. Top scientists are those who would be introduced with highest priority, while outstanding scientists have the potential to grow into top scientists. And brilliant scientists are the last ones to be introduced. That is to ensure the talents introduced are at least above the average of the academic standards globally. The paper puts forward an evaluation system of S&T talents, which takes their growth stages and disciplines' difference into account, and emphasizes on the academic reputation, outstanding academic quality and other related factors of the S&T talents in respective disciplines.
分 类 号:C962[经济管理—人力资源管理] G327[文化科学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222