中国古代史学批评范畴生成的两种途径  

Two Ways in Which the Category of Ancient Chinese Historical Criticism Were Established

作　　者：宋馥香[1] 

机构地区：[1]闽江学院历史系

出　　处：《南开学报（哲学社会科学版）》2016年第1期122-128,共7页Nankai Journal:Philosophy,Literature and Social Science Edition

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目(12JJD770010)

摘　　要：史学批评范畴是史家在史学批评活动中不断认识和逐渐积累的思想成果。中国古代史学批评范畴的生成也是这样,它经由两个路径,形成了两种主要类型:一种是前人先提出一些概念或观念,经后世史家不断阐发,使其内涵逐渐丰富,并趋于稳定,而成为范畴;另一种是后人对前人提出的某些观念,加以综合、概括,使其内涵明确,而成为范畴。The category of historical criticism is a product of the historians＇ accumulated understandings of the practice of historical criticism. This is applicable to the forming of the category of ancient historical criticism in China. It follows two different ways and forms two different types of category. The first way is one in which future historians tried to elaborate on older historians＇ concepts or ideas, enriching and stabilizing these concepts or ideas, and finally making them into category. The second way is one which future historians tried to synthesize or generalize older historian＇ s concepts, making them clearer, and turning them into category.

关 键 词：古代史学批评 才学识 直书 曲笔 史法 史意 

分 类 号：K092[历史地理—历史学]