检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张雪敏[1] 董福生[2] 卢海燕[1] 王雯[1] 马文盛[1] 胡骁颖[1] 陈文静[1]
机构地区:[1]河北医科大学口腔医院正畸科·河北省口腔医学重点实验室,石家庄050017 [2]河北医科大学口腔医院正畸科·口腔颌面外科
出 处:《实用口腔医学杂志》2016年第1期81-84,共4页Journal of Practical Stomatology
摘 要:目的:探讨汉族人颊旁间隙对微笑美的影响。方法:选出青年美貌男性1名,女性1名,用AdobeFlashCS4软件制作连续大小颊旁间隙(0%~25%)模型。选取正畸医师96名,平均年龄(35.14-7.2)岁,非专业人员96名,平均年龄(37.3±5.1)岁,分别对男、女模特颊旁间隙进行最低容忍值(A)、理想值(B)以及最高容忍值(C)的测量,数据经统计学处理。结果:对男模特的审美:正畸医师组的A、B、C值(%)分别为5.00±0.17、9.75±2.77、15.00±2.84,非专业人员组的A、B、C值分别为4.79±1.00、9.20±3.08、15.05±2.91;对女模特的审美:正畸医师A、B、C值分别为3.924-0.17、11.87±2.77、15.82±2.84,非专业人员的A、B、C值分别为4.00±1.00、12.05±3.08、15.11±2.91;各项数据组间比较,P〉0.05。男、女性颊旁间隙的理想值(%)分别为9.48±2.73和11.96±1.99,P〈0.05。结论:正畸医师与非专业人员对汉族青年颊旁间隙的审美观无差异,性别不同最美颊旁间隙大小不同。Objective: To explore the influence of buccal corridor of Han people on smile esthetics. Methods: An attractive adult male and a adult female were selected as the models. Buccal corridor was altered digitally with slider technology of Adobe Flash CS4 to obtain a continuous range of buceal corridors (0% -25 % ). 96 orthodontists aged 35.1 ± 7.2 years and 96 laypersons aged 37.3± 5.1 years were chosen as the raters. The minimum tolerable value ( A% ), the ideal value ( B% ) and the maximum tolerable value ( C% ) of buccal corridor of the models were statistically analyzed. Results : In the orthodontist groupA, B and C of the male model were 5. 00 ± 0.17, 9.75 ± 2.77 and 15.00 ± 2.84, in layperson group were 4.79 ±1.00, 9.20 ±3.08 and 15.05 ± 2.91, respec- tively; in orthodontist group, A, B and C of the female model were 3.92 ± 0.17, 11.87± 2.77 and 15.82±2.84, in layperson group were 4. 00 ± 1.00, 12.05 ±3.08 and 15.11 ± 2.91, respectively( all data between groups, P 〉 0.05 ). The ideal buccal corri- dor value( % ) of the male and female models were 9.48 ±2.73 and 11.96 ± 1.99 respectively(P 〈0.05). Conclusion: There is no difference between orthodontists and laypersons for buccal corridor esthetic judgment. The ideal esthetic buccal corridor size of male and female is different.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3