检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]内蒙古师范大学教育科学学院,呼和浩特010022 [2]内蒙古民族大学教育科学学院/心理健康研究所,通辽028000
出 处:《心理研究》2016年第1期22-26,共5页Psychological Research
摘 要:西方心理学史能否客观解读,成为制约心理学史研究和编纂的关键问题,这既是影响学者学术思想能否被客观评价的问题,也是关乎学科发展的重大理论问题。有学者认为心理学史应遵照客观历史原封不动地进行客观性解读,有学者则认为心理学史应根据现代人的立场,寻求两种视域的融合。因此,也就有了心理学史研究客观性的问题,以及心理学史研究厚古说与厚今说的问题。本文认为应该在尊重客观心理学历史的前提下,立足于现代人的立场,用现代的眼光审视并解读心理学历史,做到寻求差异、积极比较、整合观点三方面。Objective interpretation on the history of western psychology has become a key issue in the research and compilation on the psychological history, which is not only an issue of the objective evaluation of academic ideas, but also a major theoretical issue of the development of disciplines. Some scholars believe that psychological history should be in accordance with the objective historical, some scholars argue that psychological history should be according to the position of modern psychology; Some scholars think that psychological history should be according to the position of the modern people for the fusion of the two horizons. As a result, there will be a question of objectivity research for psychological history, and Historicism or Presentism. The article thinks that we should be based on the premise of respecting the objective psychological history and based on the position of the modern people, with a modern perspective to examine and interpret the history of psychology, so as to seek differences, positive comparison, integration of views in three aspects.
分 类 号:B84-091[哲学宗教—基础心理学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49