检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:任剑涛[1]
出 处:《政治学研究》2016年第1期10-23,125,共14页CASS Journal of Political Science
摘 要:现代儒学与传统儒学的分野,受中国的现代转变驱动。现代政治促成多元社会,引发中国传统儒学的聚变,儒家独占国家统治思想资源的状态因此终结。两个相互连接的变化,让传统儒学从一家独尊转变为一家之言:政治与教化的合一结构、政治理论与政治实践的内嵌关系,相应告终。现代尝试重建儒学的部分人士,总是心怀一种重光儒家独尊的意念,这是与现代处境相悖的想象。对重建儒家的尝试者来讲,正视现代变迁大势,据守社会领域,推进中国的现代发展;尽力聚集社会文化资源以成富有见地的一家之言,提升中国文化的现代品质,可能是重兴儒家的恰切进路。Modern politics promotes a pluralistic society,which triggers the fusion of Chinese traditional Confucianism and ends the state of Confucian's monopoly of mind resources in state ruling.These changes combined with each other,have turned traditional Confucianism from a dominant school to one of all the particular schools. Thus,the combined structure of the political and the civilized,the embedded relationship between political theory and political practice,has been broken down accordingly. Some people who attempt to rebuild Confucianism in modern times always have the aspiration to restore the dominant position of Confucianism,which is actually an imagination inconsistent with modern circumstance. However,to them,the probable proper approach to recover Confucianism is to face up the momentum of modern transition,guard the social domain,and impel modern development in China,as well as to gather social cultural resources and have Confucianism become an intelligent particular school so as to help promoting modern quality of Chinese culture.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.117.216.191