网络侵权投诉的平台审核及边界  

Examination Boundary of Infringement Notice by the Internet Platform

作　　者：倪朱亮[1] 

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学民商法学院,重庆401120

出　　处：《重庆邮电大学学报（社会科学版）》2016年第1期44-50,共7页Journal of Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications(Social Science Edition)

基　　金：重庆市研究生科研创新项目:自由还是管制:商标秩序的构建(YKC201501076);西南政法大学校级重点创新项目:市场经济中商标秩序的构建研究(XZYJS2014013)

摘　　要：现行法律规定网络平台侵权投诉(即通知)的形式审查,在机制目的设置上,旨在降低平台实质审查带来的高成本。然而,过于简单的形式审查要件之规定对平台的稳定性与人力审核成本反而提出了更高的要求。为维护平台信息数据的稳定性,平台难免会选择实质审查来减少形式审查所产生的信息波动。这又与网络平台侵权投诉形式审查的宗旨相悖。平台针对不同的权利类型的投诉进行审核,其中最为核心的就是对"构成侵权的初步证明材料"的把握。这个过程是个主观大于客观的自我内心确信。在以高度盖然性为标准的大前提下,网络平台要做的是权利归属的恰当性判断。The purpose of regulating formality examination to the internet infringement notice is to reduce the cost of substance examination by the internet platform. However,the effect of above regulation leads to much higher level to internet platform for maintaining the stabilization and the cost of review. In order to maintain the data stabilization,platform should carry out the substance examination instead of formality examination that will bring about data fluctuation,which runs counter to the above purpose. Internet platform should examine the notice according to the types of rights and the most important thing for platform is to understand and manipulate the preliminary materials that can prove infringement.What＇s more,the whole examination is an inner confirmation that the subjective is much more vital than the objective.With the standard of high probability,the internet platform has to judge the owner of right properly.

关 键 词：投诉 高度盖然性 初步证明 边界 

分 类 号：D923[政治法律—民商法学]