中美图书情报硕士专业学位教育质量保障体系比较分析及启示  

Comparative Analysis and Enlightenment of Education Quality Assurance System in Master of Library and Information Science Between China and the USA

作　　者：桂思思[1] 方婧[1] 陆伟[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]武汉大学信息管理学院,武汉430072 [2]武汉大学信息资源研究中心,武汉430072

出　　处：《图书情报工作》2015年第24期12-19,共8页Library and Information Service

基　　金：武汉大学2014年度学位与研究生教育教学改革研究项目"专业学位研究生质量保障体系建设研究--以图书情报专业学位为例"研究成果之一

摘　　要：[目的 /意义]美国图书情报教育历史悠久,具有完善的教育质量保障体系,而我国图书情报教育历史较短。对比分析中美教育质量保障体系,能为我国完善图书情报硕士专业学位教育质量保障体系的构建、推进学科发展提供借鉴。[方法 /过程]以中美31所设立了图书情报硕士专业学位授予点的培养单位为研究对象,运用网络调研法和对比分析法,分别从内部保障体系和外部保障体系两方面入手进行调研和分析;着重对比分析中美两国图书情报硕士专业学位教育质量保障体系的特色与异同。[结果 /结论]针对我国图书情报硕士专业学位教学质量保证体系的现状,提出相关改善建议,以促使我国逐渐构建高校、政府、社会组织相结合的混合型图书情报硕士专业学位教育保障体系,共同推动图书情报专业硕士教育的发展。[Purpose / significance]Master of Library and Information Science（ MLIS） education in the USA benefits from a long history,and establishes a relatively perfect education quality assurance system. Considering the relative short history of Chinese MLIS education,comparing and analyzing Chinese and American education quality guarantee system will provide a considerable reference for improving the constitution of China＇s MLIS education quality assurance system and development of library and information science. [Method / process]Through the network research method,this paper takes 31 schools that have the right of degree-conferring of MLIS in both China and USA as the research objects,and focuses on the characteristics and differences of education quality assurance system from the aspects of internal and external.[Result/conclusion]This paper puts forward some corresponding suggestions aiming at improving MLIS education quality assurance system in China. It will help China to set up a mixed MLIS education quality assurance system which universities,government and social organizations work together to promote the development of MLIS education.

关 键 词：图书情报 硕士教育 质量保障体系 中美比较 

分 类 号：G643[文化科学—高等教育学] G250-4[文化科学—教育学]