企业为什么不实施民主参与管理:来自海峡两岸的证据  

Why Private Enterprise Don't Implement Participative and Democratic Management:Evidence from Both Sides across the Taiwan Strait

作　　者：郑文智[1] 许苗苗[1] 庄伯超[1] 

机构地区：[1]华侨大学工商管理学院,泉州362021

出　　处：《管理评论》2016年第3期116-125,共10页Management Review

基　　金：国家社科基金项目(12CGL072);福建省社科规划项目(FJ2015B218)

摘　　要：在综合回顾人力资源管理与劳动关系学关于工作场所管理理论的基础上,本文基于两岸四地的调查数据,探讨两岸企业民主参与管理的影响因素。结果显示:组织结构有机化与组织气氛的改善有利于两岸企业的民主参与管理行为,而组织规模与企业的人文关怀与决策参与等民主参与管理行为呈U型关系。外部因素在组织因素与企业民主参与管理之间具有调节效应,劳动力市场的规范与公民参与意识的提升促进了大规模企业的相关民主参与管理行为,但也弱化了组织气氛与组织结构对民主参与管理的作用。如何提升组织结构的有机化,并营造良好的组织气氛,去实现民主参与管理,成为企业内外部制度设计的关键。Based on a comprehensive review of human resource management and labor relations theory,and private enterprise＇s survey data of four areasacross the Taiwan Strait,this paper discusses the factors that affect private enterprises＇ participative and democratic management. Results show that organic structure and good organizational climate are beneficial to enterprises management. There is a ushaped relationship between organization scale and humanistic caring and decision-making participation. External factors moderate the effect of organizational factors on enterprise democratic management. Labor market standardization and citizen participation promotes democratic participation management in large enterprises,but weakens the role that organizational atmosphere and organizational structure play in democratic management. How to make organizational structure more organic and create good atmosphere to realize participative and democratic management is the key to enterprises＇ internal and external system design.

关 键 词：民主参与管理 民营企业 影响因素 

分 类 号：F272.93[经济管理—企业管理]