“为文造情”一辩  

An Argument on “Expressing Emotions in Order To Write”

作　　者：邓军海[1] 

机构地区：[1]天津师范大学文学院,天津300387

出　　处：《杭州师范大学学报（社会科学版）》2016年第2期62-69,共8页Journal of Hangzhou Normal University(Humanities and Social Sciences)

基　　金：天津市艺术科学研究规划项目"走出民族政治:中国古典美学研究思路之反思"(52WN1210)的研究成果

摘　　要：对于刘勰所区分的"为情造文"和"为文造情",大多数学者均与刘勰一样,尊"为情造文"而黜"为文造情"。究诸写作实际,"为文造情"并非我们通常所认为的那样十分要不得。正如"为情造文"会有败笔一样,"为文造情"也会有佳作。单方面肯定"为情造文",会使我们对传统文论中的一些盲点视而不见。重新审视并评价"为文造情",有助于我们反思传统文论中一些被视为理所当然的基本假定。Since Liu Xie made a distinction between＂writing in order to express emotions＂and＂expressing emotions in order to write＂,most scholars have agreed with him in advocating the former and rejecting the latter. However,judging from the practice of writing,＂expressing emotions in order to write＂is not as undesirable as we tend to think. Just as＂writing in order to express emotions＂may produce clumsy works,＂expressing emotions in order to write＂may also lead to good works. Merely affirming ＂writing in order to express emotions＂may prevent us from seeing some blind spots in traditional literary theory. Reexamination and reevaluation of ＂expressing emotions in order to write＂can help us rethink some of the basic assumptions in traditional literary theory that we have taken for granted.

关 键 词：刘勰 为文造情 表现说 情感 语言 

分 类 号：I04[文学—文学理论]