科学是一种社会意象吗?——布鲁尔社会建构主义科学观批判  

Is Science a Kind of Social Imagery?——A Criticism of Bloor's Social Constructivism View of Science

作　　者：尹维坤[1] 

机构地区：[1]华南师范大学公共管理学院,广州510006

出　　处：《科学与管理》2016年第2期52-57,共6页Science and Management

摘　　要：布鲁尔社会建构主义科学观的核心观点是科学是一种社会意象。他一方面通过将科学知识的客观性与社会制度的权威性类比,试图说明科学不过是社会常规;另一方面对寻找科学规范性的科学哲学进行意识形态的比附,论证科学哲学本身就是社会常规的产物,从而进一步解构科学的客观性。这种类比论证缺乏说服力。科学的客观性与社会常规的权威性有本质差异。因此,"科学是一种社会意象"的论题远远没有得到合理地论证。The key point of David Bloor's social constructivism view of science is that science is a kind of social imagery. On the one hand he tries to illustrate science just as social convention, by drawing an analogy between the objectivity of scientific knowledge and the authority of social system; on the other hand to demonstrate that the philosophy of science itself is the product of social routine, further deconstruct objectivity of science, by seeking a metaphor between scientific normative pursued by philosophy of science and ideology, This analogy argument unpersuasive. The objectivity of science is fundamentally different from the authority of social convention. Therefore, the thesis of 'science is a kind of social image' is far from being rational argument.

关 键 词：社会意象 大卫·布鲁尔 社会建构主义 科学观 

分 类 号：B031[哲学宗教—哲学理论]