检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李理[1]
机构地区:[1]中国社会科学院近代史所
出 处:《台湾研究》2016年第2期86-94,共9页Taiwan Studies
摘 要:2014年台湾高中历史课程纲要的微调,对台湾史实有了更为准确细致的说明,也显示其以台湾为主体性的台湾史特色。但这样的课纲微调却遭到台湾各界的反对,特别是台湾历史学界的部分学者们也参与其中,不能不说是"台独"的意识形态在作怪。故研究课程纲要微调之具体内容是否符合历史史实,揭露"台独"势力想利用课纲微调,煽动蛊惑朴素的青少年沦于台湾政客斗争急先锋的本质,十分必要。The fine-tuning of Taiwan's high school history textbook outline in 2014 gave more accurate and detailed explanation to Taiwan's history facts, and also displayed the feature of Taiwan history with Taiwan's subjectivity. However, this new outline was opposed by all circles of Taiwan society. Some Taiwan historians participated into the movement, we could say nothing but attributed it to the ideology of "Taiwan independence." Therefore, it is necessary for us to make clear whether the revisions were accord with historical facts or not, and to expose the nature of "Taiwan independence" forces trying to use the revision of textbook outline to agitate teen-agers to act as daring vanguards of Taiwan political struggles.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30