检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:俱国鹏[1]
机构地区:[1]宝鸡文理学院,陕西宝鸡721013
出 处:《高教学刊》2016年第12期167-168,共2页Journal of Higher Education
基 金:陕西省高等教育教学改革研究项目研究成果"基于教学内涵建设的地方本科高校校内教学质量保障与监控体系的实践探索"(编号:13BZ51)
摘 要:在教学管理信息化程度不断加深的背景下,网上评教以其操作便捷、数据处理准确、结果反馈及时顺畅等优势,成为许多高校评价教师教学工作的重要手段。网上评教中存在的师生认识有偏差、指标设置不科学、结果处置不当等问题,严重影响工作效能。转变工作理念,科学设置评价指标、合理处置评价结果、完善工作机制是改进网上评教工作的重要方法和途径。: In the background of gradually developed Teaching Management Information, online evaluation of teaching become an important means of evaluating teachers" teaching work in many colleges and universities because of its advantages, such as easy operation, accurate data processing, timely and smooth feedbaCk on results and so on. But there are still some problems, including the misunderstanding of teachers and students about the online teaching evaluation, unscientific index setting, in appropriate results disposal and others, which have serious impact on the effectiveness of the work. The ways to improve the online evaluation of teaching are changing work philoso- phy, setting scientific evaluation index, disposing evaluation results reasonably, perfecting work mechanism.
分 类 号:G647[文化科学—高等教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.189.188.228