侦控人员回避的内在逻辑——以中国诉讼回避对象的历史变迁为视角  

The Inherent Logic of the Reason Why Investigators and Public Prosecutors Should Be Challenged——From the Perspective of the Historical Change of Challenge Subject in China

作　　者：朱卿[1] 

机构地区：[1]吉林大学"2011计划".司法文明协同创新中心,吉林长春130012

出　　处：《宝鸡文理学院学报（社会科学版）》2016年第3期94-99,共6页Journal of Baoji University of Arts and Sciences：Social Science Edition

摘　　要：与外国法一般将诉讼回避的对象限于裁判者不同,中国法律自古以来就规定了相当广泛的回避对象范围。其中,侦控人员被纳入诉讼回避的范围是最主要的一个特点。中国古代的诉讼回避制度产生于"公"与"私"之间的对立,因此回避对象及于许多参与诉讼的官员,而不限于审判者;近代以来,法律将侦控人员纳入回避对象的范围,除了因为检察官一度承担预审职能外,还与侦控人员在审前程序中拥有不受中立审判者制约的权力有关。诉讼回避对象的广泛性揭示出中国法律在确定诉讼回避对象时的内在逻辑,即:任何人不得参与与自己有关的案件,凡是可能因偏私对案件的公正处理造成影响的,都应当回避。Since ancient times,the scope of challenge subject was quite wide in Chinese law,in-stead of limited in the judge in western laws.the most significant feature is that investigators and public prosecutors are required to be challenged in criminal procedures.Chinese ancient challenge sys-tem was arise from the opposition between the concept of public and private,as the consequence, many officials must be challenged in the lawsuit,not limited in the judge.From the modern China, investigators and public prosecutors are required to be challenged,which is not only because public prosecutors assume the powers of pre-trial,but also relates to the fact that they have the unchecked power in the pre-trial process.The wideness revealed the inherent logic of Chinese procedure law when define the scope of challenge subject,which is one should not participate in the related cases and those who could affect the impartiality of cases due to favoritism must be challenged.

关 键 词：诉讼 回避对象 侦控人员 检察官 

分 类 号：D925.1[政治法律—诉讼法学]