辩证理解刘勰“宗经”思想的多元化内涵  

Understanding the Multiple Meanings of Liu Xie's “Tenet of Classics” Dialectically

作　　者：刘淮南[1] 

机构地区：[1]忻州师范学院中文系,山西忻州034000

出　　处：《河北学刊》2016年第4期112-116,共5页Hebei Academic Journal

基　　金：山西省高等学校教学改革项目<中国文学批评史教学实践专题研究>(J2012093);山西省高校重点扶持学科项目<佛教与中古文学>的阶段性成果

摘　　要：从整体的、互文的视角探讨《文心雕龙》,刘勰的文学观念是超越儒道释的,他所说的经典包括儒家为首的各家各派的高水平著述,而非仅限于儒道释三家之中的任何一家。人的自觉和文的自觉既使刘勰的"圣人"观不限于之前的任何一家,也使其着眼于对经典的探讨。开放的视野和宽广的胸怀显示了刘勰《原道》的目的,也与其《征圣》和《宗经》的思想前呼后应,一起为《文心雕龙》全书的展开奠定了一个坚实的基础。由此看来,认为刘勰的"宗经"思想是局限于儒道释中任何一家的观点,实际上是将依附性思维方式强加给了刘勰。The literary ideas of The Literary Minds and Carving Dragons go beyond the Confucian, Buddhist and Taoist thoughts. Man＇s and literary self- consciousness by Liu Xie is not limited in any school of thought, but focuses on the exploration of classics. The opening vision and broad mind reflect his aim of ＂Original Way＂, in cooperation with his ＂Learning from Sages＂ and ＂Tenet of Classics＂, all laying a solid foundation for the further development of the whole book of The Literary Minds and Carving Dragons. In conclusion, it is wrong to think that Liu Xie is limited in any school of thought.

关 键 词：刘勰 经典 宗经 

分 类 号：I02[文学—文学理论]