检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张恒超[1]
机构地区:[1]天津商业大学法学院心理学系,天津300134
出 处:《西南师范大学学报(自然科学版)》2016年第6期162-167,共6页Journal of Southwest China Normal University(Natural Science Edition)
基 金:天津市教育科学"十二五"规划重点课题(HE2014)
摘 要:以72名大学生为被试,设计虚拟学习材料,创设参照性交流和个人学习方式,通过功能预测学习任务和维度选择任务,比较参照性交流与个人学习者学习过程、选择性注意的差异特点.结果显示:功能预测中学习阶段1至学习阶段2学习者间成绩差异无统计学意义,学习阶段3至学习阶段10参照高分组成绩显著高于低分组和个人组,差异具有统计学意义;维度选择中参照高分组、低分组被试揭开的维度平均数均显著高于个人组,差异具有统计学意义.表明与个人学习者比较,参照性交流学习优势仅表现于高分学习者;参照性交流学习者选择性注意水平高于个人学习者.72undergraduate students have participated in the current study.The study is designed for the experimental material of virtual aliens.It has arranged the conditions of individual learning and referential communication learning.Through the functional prediction task and dimension selection task,it has explored the differences of learning process and selective attention among learners.The results showed that,from Block 1to Block 2,there is no significant difference in Function Prediction scores;From Block 3to Block 10,the scores of the high-score group are significantly higher than those of the low-score group and individual group,the average numbers of dimension selection of communication learners are significantly higher than those of individual learners.The results show that,compared with the individual learner,the advantage of referential communication learning only came from the high-score group.The levels of selective attention under the referential communication condition were significantly higher than the level of individual learners.
分 类 号:B842[哲学宗教—基础心理学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.12