检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中南大学湘雅二院精神卫生研究所,长沙410011 [2]湖南中医药大学应用心理学系,长沙410007
出 处:《中国临床心理学杂志》2016年第3期558-560,565,共4页Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基 金:湖南省教育厅科学研究青年项目(编号:13B081);湖南省哲学社会科学基金项目(编号:14YBA300)
摘 要:目的:探讨情绪智力和自我领导对大学压力应对方式影响中积极情绪与自我效能感的中介作用。方法:对575名大学生施测情绪智力量表、自我领导量表、积极情绪量表、自我效能感量表与压力应对方式量表。结果:1积极应对方式与情绪智力、自我领导、自我效能感、积极情绪呈显著正相关;2自我效能感是情绪智力与积极应对关系之间的完全中介变量,自我领导方式对积极应对直接效应显著。结论:情绪智力与自我领导对积极应对具有显著预测作用。自我效能感在情绪智力与积极应对关系之间具有中介作用。Objective: To explore the mediating effect of positive affect and self-efficacy on the influence of EI and self- leadership on stress coping. Methods: 575 students from two Chinese universities completed questionnaires that measured stress coping, self-leadership, emotional intelligence, self-efficacy, and positive affect. Results: (1)Significant relation- ships were observed between active coping, self-leadership, emotional intelligence, self-efficacy, and positive affect; (2) Self-efficacy fully mediated the relationship between emotional intelligence and active coping. Self-leadership had a direct effect on active coping, and no mediation effects between self-leadership and active coping were observed. Conclusion: Emotional intelligence and Self-leadership both predict active coping, and self-efficacy mediates the relationship between Emotional intelligence and active coping.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3