检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杜俊涛[1,2] 田爱琴 聂双双 李恒奎 刘堂红[2]
机构地区:[1]中车青岛四方机车车辆股份有限公司,山东青岛266111 [2]中南大学交通运输工程学院轨道交通安全教育部重点实验室,湖南长沙410075
出 处:《铁道科学与工程学报》2016年第6期1017-1024,共8页Journal of Railway Science and Engineering
基 金:国家高技术研究发展计划(863计划)项目(2012AA112001)
摘 要:采用三维、不可压N-S方程和k-ε湍流模型,计算不同流线型长度、剖面型线和局部参数等46种外形列车在明线运行的阻力和升力气动性能。研究结果表明:流线型长度从8 m增加到12 m,阻力系数减少2%,升力系数减少21.6%;合理优化头部纵剖面线形状可以使阻力系数减少0.94%,升力系数减少3.57%;与较宽型线相比,采用较尖的头部水平剖面线形状可以使阻力系数减少1.3%,升力系数减少3.6%;与较宽横截面侧边间距相比,减少横截面侧边线间距可以使阻力系数减少1.4%,升力系数减少3.6%。鼻尖高度的降低,鼻锥宽度的变窄,都会使列车阻力系数和升力系数减少,随着前窗高度的增加,阻力呈现先减少、后增大的趋势,前窗高度为2.4 m时,阻力系数最少。其研究结果可为高速列车的外形设计提供参考依据。The paper studies the drag force and lift force of 46 kinds of trains with different nose shape by using3 D incompressible k-ε turbulent model,and the relationship between the aerodynamic performances and the train nose parameters are established.The results show that: when the streamline length increases from 8 m to 12 m,the drag coefficient decreases 2%,and the lift coefficient decreases 21.6%.When the shape of longitudinal profile line is optimized,the drag coefficient decreases 0.94%,and the lift coefficient decreases 3.57%.Compared with the tympaniform type,acuate shape of horizontal profile can make the drag coefficient decrease1.3%,and the lift coefficient decrease 3.6%.Compared with the wide distance of the side edge of the cross-section,the decrease of distance can make the drag coefficient decrease 1.4%,and the lift coefficient decrease3.6%.With the decrease height of the nose tip and the width of the nose cone,the drag and lift coefficient decrease.When the height of the front window is 2.4 m,the drag coefficient is the smallest.The above results may provide the reference for the shape design of the high-speed train.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.121