检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:金国[1]
机构地区:[1]南京师范大学教育科学学院,江苏南京210024
出 处:《清华大学教育研究》2016年第3期100-108,124,共10页Tsinghua Journal of Education
基 金:江苏省社科基金重点项目"民国教育学术史研究"(13JYA001);江苏省教育厅高等学校哲学社会科学基金项目"教育独立与资源获取:私立南开大学外部互动关系研究"(2015SJD158);江苏省普通高校研究生科研创新计划资助项目(KYLX15_0706)
摘 要:20世纪20年代中后期"新教育中国化"作为一项"运动"引发广泛关注。过往学者将这一运动定性为"学术运动",较少或绝少提及国民政府参与并实施新教育中国化改革的历史事实。然而,通过研究可以发现,"新教育中国化"并非仅是一场学术运动,更是一场由学界期待国家力量的参与,国民政府积极主导,联合社会各界,旨在改造弊窦丛生的新教育所进行的教育改革运动。此次教育改革运动中凸显的国民政府教育治理逻辑,对于当下处于"深化教育领域综合改革"阶段的教育现实有着经验参照的作用。In the late twenty's,Chinese indigenization of new education turned into a"movement"which has attracted widespread of attention.Previous scholars usually defined it as academic movement,hardly or rarely mentioning the influence of the KMT government who participated in and implemented the Chinese indigenization of new education.However,reviewing literature,it suggests that the"Chinese indigenization of new education"was not only an academic movement,but also an educational reform movement which as expected has involved all national power and the KMT government actively led.Supported by all societal sections,this movement aimed to reconstruct the"new education"which had been very disadvantaged and urgently demanded a change.This movement represented the logic how the KMT government managed education and became a lesson for the present education reality which is at the deepening stage of comprehensive reform in educational field.
分 类 号:G40-09[文化科学—教育学原理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30