“禘”解在朱子学中的意蕴  

The Implication of Di's Interpretation in Zhu Xi's Classics

作　　者：曾令巍[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学哲学院

出　　处：《中州学刊》2016年第5期111-115,共5页Academic Journal of Zhongzhou

摘　　要：在经学史上,关于"禘"的理解历来就存有分歧,尤自郑玄、王肃以降。至唐代《五经正义》颁之国胄,世人治经唯郑之从。然而,民间也出现了以赵匡为代表的新的学术动向且开宋学先风。以程朱为代表的宋儒虽采赵匡之说,但因朱子不满程子解"禘"而程朱之判已明;虽然学宗朱子,但是以吴澄、陈澔为代表的门人后学对"禘"的理解也有区别。因此通过对"禘"的研究,可以一窥朱子学在经学领域,尤其是礼学研究方面的精微化趋势。In the history of the studies on Confucian classics, there had been a divergence upon the interpretation of Di, especially since Zheng Xuan and Wang Su. After True Meaning of Five Classics was published in Tang Dynasty, almost everyone who studied Con- fucian classics followed the paradigm of Zheng Xuan. However, there had been a new academic change which was represented by Zhao Kuang. He led the academic circles of Song Dynasty by a created style. Although the Confucian scholars of the Song Dynasty who were represented by Cheng-Zhu used Zhao Kuang＇s theory, Zhu Xi didn＇t.agree with Cheng Zi＇s view of Di. The distinction between their o- pinions was obvious. But there were different understandings related Di among Zbu Xi＇s disciples and successors such as Wu Cheng and Chen Hao, although their thoughts were originated from Zhu Xi. In a word, by studying Di, we can see the refinement trend of the stud- ies concerning Zhu Xi in the field of classics interpretation, as well as the Li＇s research.

关 键 词：禘 四时祭 程朱 义理解经 朱子学 

分 类 号：B244.7[哲学宗教—中国哲学]